With a nati­on­wi­de net­work of health­ca­re faci­li­ties, Lil­li­an Care aims to deli­ver pri­ma­ry health­ca­re to under­ser­ved are­as. Ärz­te­nach­rich­ten­dienst spo­ke with foun­der Linus Drop about the con­cept.

So Mr. Drop, can you tell me brief­ly what it is exact­ly that you are plan­ning with Lil­li­an Care?

The con­cept is based on two com­pon­ents: We are ope­ning gene­ral health­ca­re prac­ti­ces in medi­cal­ly under­ser­ved regi­ons. To the pati­ent, they look like nor­mal medi­cal prac­ti­ces. Insi­de, howe­ver, they are orga­ni­zed dif­fer­ent­ly. First of all, our phy­si­ci­ans are not in the prac­ti­ce five days a week, but ins­tead are offe­ring tele­me­di­cal ser­vices from home on a spe­ci­fic days.

In many cases, phy­si­ci­ans are no lon­ger wil­ling to relo­ca­te to the­se under­ser­ved regi­ons. We want to make it pos­si­ble to prac­ti­ce gene­ral medi­ci­ne in rural are­as wit­hout having to move the cen­ter of your family’s life the­re.

The second thing is the dis­tri­bu­ti­on of work. We have too few doc­tors in gene­ral, so we need a dif­fe­rent dis­tri­bu­ti­on of work within such a prac­ti­ce. This is whe­re we rely on a medi­cal team, in which signi­fi­cant parts of the tre­at­ment are pro­vi­ded by non-phy­­si­ci­an staff. In our case, this will main­ly be phy­si­ci­an assistants, but com­mu­ni­ty health nur­ses may also beco­me invol­ved in the future. This is what has long been prac­ti­ced in many other count­ries – Scan­di­na­via, the UK, and the US. The com­plex cases are hand­led by the phy­si­ci­an, the simp­ler ones by the nur­ses – and the out­co­mes are equi­va­lent or bet­ter than they are here.

Howe­ver, we ensu­re that the phy­si­ci­ans retain over­all respon­si­bi­li­ty by means of super­vi­si­on. We deli­bera­te­ly wan­ted to move away from con­cepts such as sub­sti­tu­ti­on and dele­ga­ti­on, becau­se such ter­mi­no­lo­gy refle­xi­vely trig­gers cer­tain opi­ni­ons. And what we are doing is some­thing in bet­ween. A phy­si­ci­an is invol­ved in any tre­at­ment we pro­vi­de. The goal is to find a balan­ce: As much as pos­si­ble should be hand­led by others, but the phy­si­ci­an remains invol­ved — sim­ply for a much shorter peri­od of time. Nevert­hel­ess, he or she can inter­ve­ne at any time.

You are orga­ni­zing the enti­re ope­ra­ti­on as a medi­cal care cen­ter. How lar­ge will the indi­vi­du­al faci­li­ties be?

Yes, it’s a medi­cal care cen­ter, we can’t orga­ni­ze it any other way. But the phy­si­ci­ans can also beco­me share­hol­ders. We don’t want the phy­si­ci­ans to be „just“ employees, but also part­ners in the big pic­tu­re. That’s an opti­on, the phy­si­ci­ans don’t have to do it, but we offer it to all of them.

Nor is it a mat­ter of the phy­si­ci­ans having to bring a lot of capi­tal to the table. For the launch, we’­re clas­si­cal­ly inves­­tor-fun­­ded. To get things rol­ling, we’­ve orga­ni­zed the capi­tal. For us, it’s more about get­ting the phy­si­ci­ans more invol­ved in the decis­­i­on-making pro­cess and about com­mit­ment.

Size-wise, the prac­ti­ce is ori­en­ted toward two phy­si­ci­ans in terms of pati­ent volu­me. But the break­down will be dif­fe­rent: one phy­si­ci­an or one doc­tor and 1.2 full-time posi­ti­ons for phy­si­ci­an assistants or some­thing simi­lar. The units will be rather small, becau­se the loca­li­ties we want to go to are usual­ly quite small.

All admi­nis­tra­ti­ve things will be com­ple­te­ly cen­tra­li­zed, we want to keep that out of