With a nati­on­wi­de net­work of health­ca­re faci­li­ties, Lil­li­an Care aims to deli­ver pri­ma­ry health­ca­re to under­ser­ved are­as. Ärz­te­nach­rich­ten­dienst spo­ke with foun­der Linus Drop about the con­cept.

So Mr. Drop, can you tell me brief­ly what it is exact­ly that you are plan­ning with Lil­li­an Care?

The con­cept is based on two com­pon­ents: We are ope­ning gene­ral health­ca­re prac­ti­ces in medi­cal­ly under­ser­ved regi­ons. To the pati­ent, they look like nor­mal medi­cal prac­ti­ces. Insi­de, howe­ver, they are orga­ni­zed dif­fer­ent­ly. First of all, our phy­si­ci­ans are not in the prac­ti­ce five days a week, but ins­tead are offe­ring tele­me­di­cal ser­vices from home on a spe­ci­fic days.

In many cases, phy­si­ci­ans are no lon­ger wil­ling to relo­ca­te to the­se under­ser­ved regi­ons. We want to make it pos­si­ble to prac­ti­ce gene­ral medi­ci­ne in rural are­as wit­hout having to move the cen­ter of your fami­ly’s life the­re.

The second thing is the dis­tri­bu­ti­on of work. We have too few doc­tors in gene­ral, so we need a dif­fe­rent dis­tri­bu­ti­on of work within such a prac­ti­ce. This is whe­re we rely on a medi­cal team, in which signi­fi­cant parts of the tre­at­ment are pro­vi­ded by non-phy­­si­ci­an staff. In our case, this will main­ly be phy­si­ci­an assistants, but com­mu­ni­ty health nur­ses may also beco­me invol­ved in the future. This is what has long been prac­ti­ced in many other count­ries – Scan­di­na­via, the UK, and the US. The com­plex cases are hand­led by the phy­si­ci­an, the simp­ler ones by the nur­ses – and the out­co­mes are equi­va­lent or bet­ter than they are here.

Howe­ver, we ensu­re that the phy­si­ci­ans retain over­all respon­si­bi­li­ty by means of super­vi­si­on. We deli­bera­te­ly wan­ted to move away from con­cepts such as sub­sti­tu­ti­on and dele­ga­ti­on, becau­se such ter­mi­no­lo­gy refle­xi­vely trig­gers cer­tain opi­ni­ons. And what we are doing is some­thing in bet­ween. A phy­si­ci­an is invol­ved in any tre­at­ment we pro­vi­de. The goal is to find a balan­ce: As much as pos­si­ble should be hand­led by others, but the phy­si­ci­an remains invol­ved — sim­ply for a much shorter peri­od of time. Nevert­hel­ess, he or she can inter­ve­ne at any time.

You are orga­ni­zing the enti­re ope­ra­ti­on as a medi­cal care cen­ter. How lar­ge will the indi­vi­du­al faci­li­ties be?

Yes, it’s a medi­cal care cen­ter, we can’t orga­ni­ze it any other way. But the phy­si­ci­ans can also beco­me share­hol­ders. We don’t want the phy­si­ci­ans to be „just“ employees, but also part­ners in the big pic­tu­re. Tha­t’s an opti­on, the phy­si­ci­ans don’t have to do it, but we offer it to all of them.

Nor is it a mat­ter of the phy­si­ci­ans having to bring a lot of capi­tal to the table. For the launch, we’­re clas­si­cal­ly inves­­tor-fun­­ded. To get things rol­ling, we’­ve orga­ni­zed the capi­tal. For us, it’s more about get­ting the phy­si­ci­ans more invol­ved in the decis­­i­on-making pro­cess and about com­mit­ment.

Size-wise, the prac­ti­ce is ori­en­ted toward two phy­si­ci­ans in terms of pati­ent volu­me. But the break­down will be dif­fe­rent: one phy­si­ci­an or one doc­tor and 1.2 full-time posi­ti­ons for phy­si­ci­an assistants or some­thing simi­lar. The units will be rather small, becau­se the loca­li­ties we want to go to are usual­ly quite small.

All admi­nis­tra­ti­ve things will be com­ple­te­ly cen­tra­li­zed, we want to keep that out of the prac­ti­ces. Becau­se on site, the focus should real­ly be on tre­at­ment.

Do you want to focus exclu­si­ve­ly on under­ser­ved regi­ons?

Yes. We real­ly want to sol­ve pro­blems and not be ano­ther play­er going in and cher­ry-picking in cities whe­re the situa­ti­on is fine.

Are you only loo­king at pri­ma­ry care phy­si­ci­ans or spe­cia­lists as well?

For the time being, we’­re thin­king exclu­si­ve­ly in terms of pri­ma­ry care phy­si­ci­ans. Of cour­se, once such a struc­tu­re has been crea­ted, one could ima­gi­ne brin­ging in spe­cia­lists as nee­ded on cer­tain days. Howe­ver, we would then do so with part­ners – we real­ly want to focus on pri­ma­ry health­ca­re.

What role does fami­ly doc­­tor-cen­­­te­­red health­ca­re play in your plan­ned prac­ti­ces?

Fami­ly doc­­tor-cen­­­te­­red care is defi­ni­te­ly an important point for us. We assu­me that our prac­ti­ces will bene­fit from this.

Whe­re exact­ly will you be laun­ching your prac­ti­ces?

Over­all, we are loo­king nati­on­wi­de. We are start­ing with the first prac­ti­ces in the Ger­man sta­te of Rhi­­ne­­land-Pala­­ti­na­­te — quite deli­bera­te­ly the­re and not in the Ucker­mark or Bran­den­burg, in order to demons­tra­te: This is not just a pro­blem in the east, and it is not a pro­blem that only affects a few fede­ral sta­tes.

Then we will take action in the regi­on around Osna­brück. The Osna­brück regi­on is also one of our share­hol­ders through a hol­ding com­pa­ny, so we have a lot of sup­port from all sides.

It is high­ly likely that we will then also beco­me acti­ve in the sta­te of Wes­t­­pha­­lia-Lip­­pe. We are curr­ent­ly in talks with two dis­tricts the­re. Of cour­se, the pro­ject of the Asso­cia­ti­on of Sta­tu­to­ry Health Insu­rance Phy­si­ci­ans of Wes­t­­pha­­lia-Lip­­pe (KVWL) regar­ding phy­si­ci­an assistants is of gre­at inte­rest to us. We are a per­fect fit for that.

How far have the plans pro­gres­sed?

The first four units should be acti­ve by the end of this year or the begin­ning of next year – this now depends pri­ma­ri­ly on lea­se agree­ments.

Was­n’t it dif­fi­cult to find staff?

As far as Medi­cal Assistants and Phy­si­ci­an Assistants are con­cer­ned, we have a real luxu­ry situa­ti­on. We have recei­ved so many appli­ca­ti­ons that we can choo­se the best from the many good ones. And they real­ly do have to be on site in the prac­ti­ce five days a week. We just have some­thing for them that inte­rests them: To be more accoun­ta­ble and to be more visi­ble. Of cour­se, we also pay them reason­ab­ly.

We are also very satis­fied with the phy­si­ci­ans. We have three or four inte­res­ted par­ties for all loca­ti­ons.

It’s gre­at that the­re has been so much inte­rest, even though this mar­ket is so com­pe­ti­ti­ve. That gives us a tail­wind. Becau­se wit­hout phy­si­ci­ans and non-phy­­si­ci­an staff, you can think up a lot of things, but you can’t do any­thing.

How many prac­ti­ces are you plan­ning for the long term?

Very long-term, if you are loo­king at the 2030s, we are anti­ci­pa­ting seve­ral 100 prac­ti­ces that we are tar­ge­ting. But when you see that the­re will be a short­fall of 11,500 prac­ti­ces, even 100 prac­ti­ces from Lil­li­an Care is just a drop in the bucket. We can’t sol­ve the pro­blem alo­ne — tha­t’s why we don’t see our­sel­ves at all as com­pe­ting with other com­pa­nies or other phy­si­ci­ans. In fact, it will take ever­yo­ne who can come up with some­thing to sol­ve the pro­blem of health­ca­re shorta­ges.

Other medi­cal cen­ters have fai­led becau­se they are not eco­no­mic­al­ly via­ble. Why should this be dif­fe­rent for you?

One hears very dif­fe­rent reports in this regard. Of cour­se, the working hours and sche­du­les of free­lan­cers are dif­fe­rent from tho­se of sala­ried employees. This is regard­less of pro­fes­si­on. Our approach: We want to com­bi­ne both the advan­ta­ges of being an employee with the oppor­tu­ni­ties of an entre­pre­neur. After all, tha­t’s what many phy­si­ci­ans want: Not to bear the over­all finan­cial respon­si­bi­li­ty and risk alo­ne, but still to help shape a com­pa­ny.

Of cour­se, we need moti­va­ted team play­ers in our prac­ti­ces. I am opti­mi­stic that we will crea­te a well-fun­c­­tio­­ning and, of cour­se, ulti­m­ate­ly eco­no­mic­al­ly via­ble enter­pri­se.

Ever­yo­ne is awa­re of the pro­blems, health insu­r­ers, cham­bers — espe­ci­al­ly the muni­ci­pa­li­ties, which in some cases are real­ly in a sta­te of alarm. I sen­se a gre­at wil­ling­ness on all sides to deal fle­xi­bly with the regu­la­to­ry rules so that we can actual­ly estab­lish some­thing. The new Ger­man digi­tiza­ti­on laws also pro­vi­de for easier access to tele­me­di­ci­ne.

How did the idea for Lil­li­an Care come about in the first place?

I’ve been in the field of tele­me­di­ci­ne for the last 20 years and I’m real­ly exci­ted about the pos­si­bi­li­ties. But I also know the limi­ta­ti­ons. Today, mere remo­te tre­at­ment can — unfort­u­na­te­ly — only sol­ve rela­tively few cases con­clu­si­ve­ly. It sol­ves the pro­blem that we have too few phy­si­ci­ans, only to some ext­ent, but not com­ple­te­ly.

I then went on seve­ral stu­dy trips to other count­ries with the Ger­man Mana­ged Care Asso­cia­ti­on — and ever­y­whe­re the dis­tri­bu­ti­on of roles bet­ween phy­si­ci­ans and nur­ses is com­ple­te­ly dif­fe­rent from ours. That was the second part of the idea.

I have known my two com­ra­­des-in-arms for a long time. Flo­ri­an Fuhr­mann was at kv.digital for a long time and has a per­fect under­stan­ding of the tech­no­lo­gy side. Mar­kus Lies­mann is respon­si­ble for ope­ra­ti­ons at our com­pa­ny. He has estab­lished wound cen­ters throug­hout Ger­ma­ny — this also invol­ves a branch con­cept and coope­ra­ti­on bet­ween phy­si­ci­ans and non-phy­­si­ci­an staff.

So the three of us all bring expe­ri­ence to the table. Usual­ly, you think of start-up entre­pre­neurs as being in their mid-twen­­ties. We are a kind of sil­ver foun­der. In this high­ly regu­la­ted field, expe­ri­ence is incre­di­bly important. You don’t get very far with pure moti­va­ti­on; you have to know whe­re the pit­falls are.

© änd Ärz­te­nach­rich­ten­dienst Ver­­lags-AG
Source: https://www.aend.de/article/225035